THE ORIGINS OF BRADLEY AMENDMENT LAW AND RELATED LEGISLATION OVER THE YEARS.

You need to know what you are up against in a declining economy where a job loss can put you on the streets and ruin your future forever. Especially during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, the federal Bradley Law concretes the concept of a permanent subclass of Americans.

THE ORIGINS OF BRADLEY AMENDMENT LAW AND RELATED LEGISLATION OVER THE YEARS.

Exploitation Underground Railroad Forum

IS BRADLEY AMENDMENT DEBT REALLY “CHILD SUPPORT”?

THE FEDERAL BRADLEY AMENDMENT FOR CHILD SUPPORT SEEMS INNOCENT AND HELPFUL TO SOME AMERICANS ON THE SURFACE. WOMEN THINK THE LAW SUPPORTS THEM AND THEIR CHILDREN. MEN HAVE GROWN ACCUSTOMED TO BEING ABUSED AND FINANCIALLY RAPED. THE TRUTH IS EVEN WORSE AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERY AMERICAN! THE BRADLEY AMENDMENT MANDATES THAT A CHILD-SUPPORT DEBT CANNOT BE RETROACTIVELY REDUCED OR FORGIVEN EVEN IF THE DEBTOR IS UNEMPLOYED, HOSPITALIZED, IN PRISON, SENT TO WAR, DEAD, PROVED TO NOT BE THE PARENT, NEVER ALLOWED TO SEE CHILDREN, OR LOSES A JOB OR SUFFERS A PAY CUT. THE AMENDMENT HAS RESULTED IN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES THAT HAVE NEVER BEEN CORRECTED, GROSS INJUSTICES THAT ARE NEVER DEALT WITH AND MASSIVE COSTS, ESPECIALLY TO NON-CUSTODIAL PARENTS THAT ARE ALREADY UNDER THE FINANCIAL GUN. UNFORTUNATELY, THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING OF THE UNPRECEDENTED ABUSE AND VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS. THIS IMMORAL UNCONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL LAW MUST BE REPEALED BECAUSE IT VIOLATES THE RIGHTS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS.

It is the aim and purpose of this website to inform you about the injustice, prejudice and civil criminality of this federal law. The law even violates state powers guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. The enforcement of the Bradley Amendment was piloted in Massachusetts in 1993. Once the bugs were worked out, the amendment was unveiled and pressed into action by Bill and Hillary Clinton and the likes of other feminists such as Donna Shalala. While the focus of this legislation has been and is on non-custodial parents, it affects the rights of all Americans. The completed legislation in 1996 allows the government to comb through bank records regularly looking for non-custodial parents to track down. The reality is that the model and purpose of enforcement of the Bradley Amendment is hate legislation against men put in play by feminists in the early through mid-90s.

The hyperinflation of the early 80s left a larger gap between the “haves” and “have-nots”. The concept originated with Democrat Senator Bill Bradley from his observations of wealthy successful men and his comparisons of financially-strapped women with impoverished children. He reasoned that law was the way to make the wealthy braggarts pay for the needs of the poor. With fellow Democrats, he seized the political opportunity in the name of welfare reform and children. Like many other politicians, he built his Senate career on child welfare, poverty legislation and tax reform. President George Bush, Sr. contributed by signing off on child support state border legislation in 1991, opening the move for further action by the next administration. There is a reasonable body of evidence that even while the Clintons were governing in Arkansas, they were involved in the early legislation stages of Bradley’s “welfare reform” because of Hillary Clinton’s ties to child welfare and legal ties in Washington. The Clinton Administration promptly pioneered legislation with pilot programs and made successive changes in law with the help of a conflicted Congress. By 1996, the continual campaigning of Hillary Clinton and the popularity of the “village raising a child” gave the Amendment the public acceptance and political teeth necessary to invade the privacy rights of the entire country along with multiple amendment rights of parents as citizens of the United States. Guarantees by the U.S. Constitution regarding state rights and authority are being violated. History reveals a gradual process, originally by a combination of deceipt and compromise, and a handful of major players determined to complete the invasive process.

As a result, the guarantee of due process no longer exists for child support law. Bradley Amendment enforcement devised by the Clinton Administration is not about child support. It is about control of human rights, larger government and control of human freedom in the name of welfare reform and children’s rights. No man or woman should be oppressed by an immoral violation of civil rights like the unconstitutional law and enforcement of the Bradley Amendment. Continuous violation of civil rights by the U.S. government has held sway since enforcement by the Clinton Administration.

There is active interest by many thousands that are willing to sign petitions. Untold thousands more are needed to overturn this legislation and illegal enforcement. Don’t give up! Get informed! Know how it affects you and others around you. It may not be popular, but don’t let that stop the movement for America’s Constitutional Rights.

No new reform legislation has been introduced since 2006 and child support news in general is passe. Ignorance and hurt feelings loom large. Disregard for others and the right to entitlement reign supreme in American community. The press is silent and yet the evil of this unconstitutional amendment and enforcement affects untold millions. Don’t buy into the notion that the Bradley Amendment is business as usual in government and that there is no hope. This website maintains current links and is looking to make a difference. Tell your friends. Millions of American men and women are being oppressed and ruined without an option because of enforcement of this illegal and immoral federal law cleverly devised by special political interests and enhanced to a razor’s edge by the Clinton Administration. No law should prescribe and reinforce misfortune and disaster in life. There is much more here than meets the eye!

Bradley is out of office, but “his law” is still in place and being enforced with law developed by hateful activist administrators. It’s time to tell the Congress and Senate that you want this immoral and illegal law repealed from U.S. Federal Law. No Federal Law is needed to usurp state law on child support or take power away from judges that can mediate a child support and custody case. Child support has become a police state of federal oppression and the law isn’t working. Child support collections are down. Welfare reform hasn’t worked on any level. Money is being mishandled. The number of court orders is up. The expense of collection is spiraling upward like the welfare that this law was designed to fix. The state laws mandated are already in place to handle all child support issues in a lawful manner. You don’t have to be a prisoner in your own country! Join the fight for right for all Americans!

Is Bradley Amendment Debt really “child support”?

THE RESULT OF THIS INCREDIBLY RIGID LAW IS TO IMPOSE A PUNISHMENT THAT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANY BUT THE VERY RICH TO GET OUT FROM UNDER A BRADLEY DEBT:

* Thousands of parents have been sentenced to debtor’s prison (a medieval practice America thought was abolished centuries ago) and thousands more have had their driver’s license confiscated (making it extraordinarily difficult to get a job). Credit is being ruined and jobs are being lost. This does not assist in child support measures. 66% of men are wholly unable to pay child support, in large part due to unconstitutional federal law.
* There is no requirement that, if and when the Bradley debt is paid, the money be spent on the children, or that the debt be based on an estimate of the child’s needs, or even that the so-called children actually be children (some states require the non-custodial parent to pay for college tuition).
* The Bradley debt is misnamed “child support”; it is a court-imposed judgment to punish non-custodial parents and extract money from them to support a few custodial parents and a $6 billion federal-state bureaucracy.
* Cases prove that men cannot escape the Bradley debt even if DNA proves that they are not the father; the law even forbids bankruptcy to alleviate the Bradley debt.

In 2004, the Bradley Amendment was being challenged and was the subject of a repeal effort. In February of 2006, the court case was dismissed and there has not been any visible effort to reform or repeal this amendment. The resistance is great because the government has built a six-billion dollar government industry around the Amendment.