Sunday, March 3, 2013

CHILD SUPPORT IS NOT ABOUT THE CHILDREN. IT IS ABOUT HOW MUCH MONEY THE STATES CAN COLLECT IN FEDERAL FUNDING.


Bruce Eden ·  Top Commenter
As a father's rights and family rights advocate, I saw this coming over 20 years ago. This was going to happen when they were initiating garnishing wages, seizing assets, denying food stamps, denying & suspending passports, suspending drivers and professional license, etc., for child support enforcement. I said it would be ever-escalating steps where government would outlaw men, make men homeless and attempt to murder them by starving them to death. This constitutes a Bill of Attainder/Bill of Pains and Penalties (outlawed by the US Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 and Section 10, Clause 1) where government targets individuals or easily ascertainable groups and outlaws them, depriving them of their rights, assets and lives.

I guess if they want "outlaws" we need to start acting like John Dillinger, Al Capone, Machine Gun Kelly, Pretty Boy Floyd, Alvin Karpis, etc. and start shooting back at the domestic enemies of this country--the US and complicit state governments that use child support enforcement to obtain federal funding to bolster their treasuries to support governmental pensions and salaries.

CHILD SUPPORT IS NOT ABOUT THE CHILDREN. IT IS ABOUT HOW MUCH MONEY THE STATES CAN COLLECT IN FEDERAL FUNDING. It works like this:

There are a lot of fathers out there who've lost their jobs thanks to our government usurping the banking and mortgage businesses, and now the car businesses. Government, with its lapdog press, like to pick on groups of people to create animosity and divisiveness. It's time to show the government for the real "deadbeat" that it is.

According to a 7-year study done by Arizona State University Professor Sanford Braver, Ph.D., which resulted in his book, "Divorced Dads--Shattering the Myths", he found that less than 5% of those that owed child support are true deadbeat dads-the ones with the younger trophy wives and sports cars, who don't want to pay anything. The truth of the matter, is that according to the Federal Gov't. General Accounting Office, Report # GAO/HRD-92-39FS, pg. 19, over 66% of those owing child support can't pay because they are unemployed, underemployed, disabled, dead, and in some cases the mothers don't want support.

Judges order such onerous child support amounts in some cases, along with alimony, daycare, medical expenses, and other expenses, that the father can't survive. He ends up becoming despondent, leaves his job and drops out of sight. He loses all contact with his child(ren) as a result. This is the government's ultimate goal. Breaking up of father-headed families (and then mother-headed ones when there are no more fathers, wherein, the government will come for the children without any resistance). Government doesn't do anything for altruism. They always have a motive behind what they do and the laws they make. It's all about money, power and control.

The reason for this: Because judges are granting high orders and enforcing them stringently because the Federal government pays the states a federal reimbursement incentive funding (42 USC Section 658a) for amounts awarded, collected and enforced. This money goes into the state coffers, no strings attached (42 USC Section 658f). The first things paid out of state treasuries are judicial salaries and pensions and state employee salaries and pensions.

This is a major unconstitutional conflict-of-interest that has been outlawed by the US Supreme Court in Tumey v. Ohio, Ward v. Monroeville, Gibson v. Berryhill and other cases. The Supreme Court held that judges and officials (i.e., child support probation officials) who sit in judgment of cases that they have a financial interest in, are too tempted to abuse their contempt powers to jail unsuspecting litigants-taxpayers to extort/extract more and more monies out of them to increase the amount of funding, and ultimately increase their salaries and pensions.

Anyone arrested on one of these orders is being arrested for not only a fraudulent order, but on a CIVIL matter. The U.S. Courts of Appeals (2nd highest courts in the land) as well as the US Supreme Ct. hold that one can't be arrested on a CIVIL matter because there is no 4th Amendment probable cause that a crime has been committed to issue an arrest warrant. These Courts of Appeals held that child support is nothing more than a common civil, commercial debt, and that it is NOT any "special kind of debt". Again, another fraud perpetrated by government officials. Every other Circuit has followed suit and hold that child support is a common commercial, civil debt.

Child support & enforcement, along with no-fault divorce is derived from Soviet Family Law, Article 81. The USSR in the 40s and 50s implemented child support enforcement & allowed no-fault divorce. When it saw that it was destroying society and that men refused to work because they had to give up 1/2 their pay for child support, they tried to stop child support & easy divorces. However, it was too late. We know the rest of the story. Now, history is repeating itself in the USA. Radical women's groups (N.O.W. & others) and the womens' bar associations have adopted Soviet-styled child support enforcement, no-fault divorce & domestic violence programs. These are utter failures being used to implement power and control over families for the destruction of families.

Further, Judges, as public officials, took an Oath of Office to uphold, support & defend the US Constitution. With that oath they acknowledge and recognized We the People's fundamentally secured constitutional rights, privileges and immunities, as a condition for the public officials' employment. Given that judges, law enforcement and even politicians have embraced this Soviet-style domestic relations ideology, this violates their Oaths of Office which constitutes felony Official Misconduct--an impeachable offense (not to mention it is treasonous & seditious to the US Constitution). Any judge making order, sitting on cases and enforcing child support must be disqualified for conflict of interest and Official Misconduct, especially if they arrest and jail someone for child support.

Along with the federal Violence Against Women Act domestic violence laws, federal child abuse prevention act, and the federal child support laws, the child support industry is a total fraud. It is a $10 BILLION per year INDUSTRY that, if eliminated, the monies saved and sent to the children that supposedly need it, would wipe out all child support arrears in the US at one time. All that would be needed to do is send the BILLIONS in the form of a Social Security check or wire transfer, since child support enforcement laws are part of the entire Social Security Act.

Bruce Eden, Civil Rights Director
DADS (Dads Against Discrimination)
Fathers’ Rights Consultant
New Jersey
b_eden@verizon.net
(973) 616-9558 (M-F, 10AM-5PM)

No comments:

Post a Comment